... like I'm 5 years old
A bird can sit on a power line because its two feet touch nearly the same electrical point. With almost no voltage difference between its feet, very little current flows through its body. The line is still dangerous: if the bird also touches another wire or grounded equipment, current can pass through it.
Imagine watching a bird settle onto a wire. It grips with one foot, then the other, and stays there while electricity continues along the metal beneath it. The bird is not protected by a special immunity, and its feet are not acting like rubber gloves. The important fact is that both feet rest on the same wire, close together.
A dangerous situation arises when the bird reaches across an electrical gap. A wing might touch a second wire, or its body might contact metal equipment connected to the ground. Now the bird can provide a path between points at different voltages. Larger birds are particularly vulnerable where wires and equipment sit close enough for their bodies to bridge that gap.
This is also why the sight of a comfortable bird should never make a power line seem safe to a person. Someone touching that line while standing on the ground would be making a very different connection. The question is not simply, “Is the wire carrying electricity?” It is, “What other electrical point is being touched at the same time?”
Think of the bird’s feet as standing on two spots on the same stair. There is hardly any height difference between them; the dangerous step is reaching from that stair to a much lower one.
... like I'm in College
The useful word here is voltage: a measure of the electrical difference between two points. Current can flow through a body when a voltage difference drives it along a conductive path. A perched bird’s feet are separated by a short stretch of highly conductive wire, so the voltage difference between those contact points is ordinarily tiny. Most current continues along the wire rather than taking a detour through the bird. For a closer look at how an electrical source drives current around a connected path, see how batteries work.
The bird does not need to be “at zero volts” to remain unharmed. Its body may be at a high voltage relative to the ground, yet have almost no voltage across itself. Those statements can both be true. What matters for a shock is the difference between the places where current could enter and leave the body.
Picture a bird shifting its wings beside a power pole. If one wing contacts another energized conductor, or grounded metal hardware, the electrical arrangement changes immediately. The bird now spans two points that may differ greatly in voltage. The resulting current can cause fatal injury. The U.S. Geological Survey’s account of bird electrocution describes this hazard, particularly on equipment with little separation between exposed parts.
Feathers are generally poor conductors, but they are not a reliable safety barrier. Contact involving skin, a beak, or a foot can conduct; wet feathers can also increase the risk. A bird’s safety depends on the contacts it makes, not on being a bird.
Build a little Lego streetscape. Stretch one long row of red bricks between two towers and call it the power line. Place a bird figure on the row with both feet close together. Then put tiny markers beneath its feet: A under the left foot, B under the right. The bricks do not conduct electricity; they are only a way to keep track of what touches what.
In this model, A and B sit on the same uninterrupted row. Give them nearly matching voltage labels. A bird-shaped route from A to B would not have much electrical difference to drive current along it, so the wire remains the overwhelmingly easier route. That is the ordinary perched-bird scene, translated into something you can inspect from above.
Next, build a second row of blue bricks a short distance away. Label it as another wire at a different voltage. Extend the bird figure’s wing until it touches blue while its foot remains on red. The figure now joins two differently labeled rows. That new connection represents the hazardous path through a real bird; the danger appears because the contacts changed, not because the bird suddenly lost a protective coating.
Finally, replace blue with a gray Lego tower representing grounded metal on a pole. A foot on red and a wing against gray can create the same kind of risk. Slide the gray tower farther away, beyond the figure’s reach, and the bridging opportunity disappears. Real wildlife-protection measures likewise focus on keeping hazardous contacts apart or shielding exposed equipment. The model’s lesson is simple: one wire beneath two feet is very different from two electrical points connected through one body.
... like I'm an expert
Treat the bird as an impedance connected between two contact points, A and B, on the same conductor. The short wire segment between those points provides a parallel, much lower-impedance path. The bird’s current depends on the potential difference between A and B: in a simple resistive approximation, (I{\text{bird}} \approx (VA-VB)/R{\text{bird}}). A power line’s voltage relative to ground, however large, does not by itself give that voltage difference across the bird.
A real conductor has nonzero impedance. Load current therefore produces some voltage drop along even a short length of wire, meaning (VA-VB) is not exactly zero. Contact conditions and the bird’s impedance also vary. The defensible explanation is that the voltage across an ordinarily perched bird is small, not that no current could ever pass through it. The electrical-safety discussion of shock-current paths makes the underlying distinction clear: exposure to a high-voltage conductor and a substantial voltage across a body are different conditions.
Now move the bird’s second contact to another phase conductor or grounded hardware. That contact replaces a short, near-equipotential span with a potentially large voltage difference. A conductive path through the animal can then carry injurious current. This is principally a geometry-and-contact problem, not a blanket ranking of lines by their advertised voltage.
Consequently, lower-voltage distribution equipment can pose a greater electrocution risk to birds than widely spaced high-voltage transmission conductors. Poles with nearby wires, transformers, or grounded fittings create more opportunities for a bird to bridge unlike potentials. The USGS account of these configurations notes that distribution-line spacing is a recurring concern.